Big Four War
23-25 July-2008
Now is the time very critical for the outcome of diplomatic dealing between Iran and the US led alliances to solve the political confrontation deeply related with uranium enrichment to be able to produce nuclear weapons by Iran to stop at once.
US said that India and USA had become natural alliance from this time onward to face against the extreme terrorism on the world stage. * thenationalinterst.org
As we had already known Japan, South Korea, in the pacific rims and Philippines, Singapore, Thailand in South Asia are alliances of USA.
Why US substituted India to Pakistan in South Asia would actually be thought as a very significant diplomatic move against the Islamic world.
After 9/11 the global political situation had been absolutely and fundamentally changed.
The Doves thought communism was gone to the end. It is just a wrong idealist view. Communism is hiding and preparing for the next struggle with the coming new generations of capitalist democracy in the name of anti-Americanism and various types of socialism or anti-religious camps.
Perhaps it might be the Hawkish view. But, Richard Nixon once said “ The most significant development of the twentieth century was not the end of colonialism or the march of democracy but the growth of totalitarian communism. “ So, it is still correct in this nuclear age and only one super power time that passed the gate of the twenty first century just a while ago. #
We should not live in the dream world or in the wishful thinking cradle.
Pragmatism is the most important thing for all to look our world so realistically and visibly than in the past century.
When India shook hands with US, the leftwing alliances of the Congress Party government was shaken too. They didn’t want India to lean more toward US though the real dangerous threat from the extremist Taliban terrorism is so close in hands. The rightwing BJP also spoke of their fear for India to become a junior partner of US in global nuclear society. * aljazeera
At that time, Nepal has been in the situation of political turmoil and still unsolved though monarchy was collapsed and the country had fallen into the hands of Maoists who have no religious beliefs. India also was start being threatened by its own Maoists at present because of undermining the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist political ideology as tiny remnants.
Then look back Tibet again. It was smashed by the Chinese Communist Government very recently because of the Tibetan people’s demand for Autonomy that was led by Buddhist monks.
Communists are non religious believers and they are materialists as their philosophy described dialectical materialism since Karl Marx’s time. Moreover, all religious beliefs are spiritualism not materialism. As for Buddhism, it is not a religion but just a philosophy preached and taught by Lord Buddha Gawtama himself.
Thus, in this situation, we can see the ideology differences among nations which only would pave the way to war. Different religious beliefs and different political outlooks are the natural cause to make wars, not by different races and different lands.
Let me please quote one of the passage by Richard Nixon here.
“Arms controllers fail to understand the basic fact that since arms are not the cause of war, arms control cannot produce peace. War results not from the existence of arms but from the political differences among nations that lead to the use of arms. “
Now we are targeting toward semi limited regional war or World War III as nuclear version as in limited sites. Is it true? So what shall we do next?
Richard Nixon said again in his “1999 - Victory without war” like that.
“We live in a world with nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons revolutionized the way the world works. In the age of balance-of-power politics, war was an accepted tactic of statecraft. “ # P66 C3
If so, diplomatically finding the solution for any gridlock encountered among the nations.
But so many deadlocks could not have found the resolutions toward peace and security.
Before wars, there were many so-called diplomacy attempts. When diplomacy collapsed, the wars broke out. It is like a chemistry formula to our global peace and security situation.
Now we can see the clear-cut view of the confrontation of the four religions that might become such a nuclear version of war as in very limited sites or maybe spreading out to the war that also globalizes as in IT revolution and international trade.
Thus, with great expectation and with strong aspiration, let us wait for the result that could halt the Great War among nations in near future as limited regional nuclear linked Power Struggle particularly between Hindu-Buddhist-Christian and Taliban Extremists.
Ye Kyaw Swa
25-7-08 /7:50am
Yangon Myanmar
Refs:
Richard Nixon- Victory without War
The National Interest Org
Nixon Center
The International herald Tribune
Aljazeera news
BBC news
23-25 July-2008
Now is the time very critical for the outcome of diplomatic dealing between Iran and the US led alliances to solve the political confrontation deeply related with uranium enrichment to be able to produce nuclear weapons by Iran to stop at once.
US said that India and USA had become natural alliance from this time onward to face against the extreme terrorism on the world stage. * thenationalinterst.org
As we had already known Japan, South Korea, in the pacific rims and Philippines, Singapore, Thailand in South Asia are alliances of USA.
Why US substituted India to Pakistan in South Asia would actually be thought as a very significant diplomatic move against the Islamic world.
After 9/11 the global political situation had been absolutely and fundamentally changed.
The Doves thought communism was gone to the end. It is just a wrong idealist view. Communism is hiding and preparing for the next struggle with the coming new generations of capitalist democracy in the name of anti-Americanism and various types of socialism or anti-religious camps.
Perhaps it might be the Hawkish view. But, Richard Nixon once said “ The most significant development of the twentieth century was not the end of colonialism or the march of democracy but the growth of totalitarian communism. “ So, it is still correct in this nuclear age and only one super power time that passed the gate of the twenty first century just a while ago. #
We should not live in the dream world or in the wishful thinking cradle.
Pragmatism is the most important thing for all to look our world so realistically and visibly than in the past century.
When India shook hands with US, the leftwing alliances of the Congress Party government was shaken too. They didn’t want India to lean more toward US though the real dangerous threat from the extremist Taliban terrorism is so close in hands. The rightwing BJP also spoke of their fear for India to become a junior partner of US in global nuclear society. * aljazeera
At that time, Nepal has been in the situation of political turmoil and still unsolved though monarchy was collapsed and the country had fallen into the hands of Maoists who have no religious beliefs. India also was start being threatened by its own Maoists at present because of undermining the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist political ideology as tiny remnants.
Then look back Tibet again. It was smashed by the Chinese Communist Government very recently because of the Tibetan people’s demand for Autonomy that was led by Buddhist monks.
Communists are non religious believers and they are materialists as their philosophy described dialectical materialism since Karl Marx’s time. Moreover, all religious beliefs are spiritualism not materialism. As for Buddhism, it is not a religion but just a philosophy preached and taught by Lord Buddha Gawtama himself.
Thus, in this situation, we can see the ideology differences among nations which only would pave the way to war. Different religious beliefs and different political outlooks are the natural cause to make wars, not by different races and different lands.
Let me please quote one of the passage by Richard Nixon here.
“Arms controllers fail to understand the basic fact that since arms are not the cause of war, arms control cannot produce peace. War results not from the existence of arms but from the political differences among nations that lead to the use of arms. “
Now we are targeting toward semi limited regional war or World War III as nuclear version as in limited sites. Is it true? So what shall we do next?
Richard Nixon said again in his “1999 - Victory without war” like that.
“We live in a world with nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons revolutionized the way the world works. In the age of balance-of-power politics, war was an accepted tactic of statecraft. “ # P66 C3
If so, diplomatically finding the solution for any gridlock encountered among the nations.
But so many deadlocks could not have found the resolutions toward peace and security.
Before wars, there were many so-called diplomacy attempts. When diplomacy collapsed, the wars broke out. It is like a chemistry formula to our global peace and security situation.
Now we can see the clear-cut view of the confrontation of the four religions that might become such a nuclear version of war as in very limited sites or maybe spreading out to the war that also globalizes as in IT revolution and international trade.
Thus, with great expectation and with strong aspiration, let us wait for the result that could halt the Great War among nations in near future as limited regional nuclear linked Power Struggle particularly between Hindu-Buddhist-Christian and Taliban Extremists.
Ye Kyaw Swa
25-7-08 /7:50am
Yangon Myanmar
Refs:
Richard Nixon- Victory without War
The National Interest Org
Nixon Center
The International herald Tribune
Aljazeera news
BBC news
